From GIZMODO

http://gizmodo.com/5546091/this-is-how-you-lift-a-sunk-war-ship-off-the-sea#comments

This Is How You Lift a Sunk War Ship Off the Sea

Send an email to Jesus Diaz, the author of this post, at jesus@gizmodo.com.

I understand but will it lift my EX-WIFE??
I think I'd like to see how they make those chains!
This is how God plays Battleship.


Just blow up every boat N.Korea has.
"If they blow up a church, I'll blow up ten churches!"

Doing a tiny bit of research (Googling), this looks like "Yoshida," Japan's largest floating crane. More here:
Edited by Nrbelex at 05/24/10 11:05 AM

So, what if the crane ship sinks, what will you use to lift THAT up?
Probably still can't lift Jay Leno's chin.


The Left Coast Lifter is the largest floating crane, capable of lifting 2,000 tons. It is currently being used to lift huge sections of the new Bay Bridge.
Segador promoted this comment

@dustboy: It looks like they're using a different crane in Korea, but nice pic nonetheless.
I know it's not a trick, but it certainly looks like forced perspective. My pea sized brain just can't reconcile how big that crane has to be.
I wonder how much water was in that thing when it reached the surface.
I bet it took a bit for the water to run out

Image of bonedog73 bonedog73 10:36 AM
North Koreans have the biggest sack in town. Attack your sworn enemy without provocation and sit back and deny it after undeniable proof otherwise.

Should the US do this too? Let's drop a few nukes on Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan.

Then play it off like an Italian mobster... YOU TALKING TO ME!
Edited by bonedog73 at 05/24/10 10:38 AM


it's off the chain!
Those images are not in the read link...



*looks at first picture*

Hmm. Pretty big ship. Nice chains.

*scrolls down to second picture*

Wha

Did they fill the boat up w/ ping pong balls to raise it? ;)
ENHANCE!

Haha, I thought the guys in the rafts in the first picture were full-sized crafts for a moment. That would make the sunken ship a monster at sea and the crane a mobile skyscraper.

@KamWrex: I thought the same thing. I'm disappointed. Though it would be funny to see those rafts riding the waves caused by the ship plunging back into the water.
Oh my. How big is that crane?
This reminds me of playing in the tub.. back when I was.....

Only I had a lot more boats...

And I was making engine / crane sounds with my mouth...
Edited by Tossed Accord Taco Salad all over Malibu's face at 05/24/10 10:16 AM

I simply cannot fathom something that massive. Holy crap.

You know...the new war in the Korea peninsular could mean the slow down of 3D technology and that could be a good thing for everybody.

I am j/k, but Japan probably will get the most benefit from the war. Japan's post world war II economy was saved by the Korean war.

I'm probably not the first to mention this. Mythbusters shows that ping pong balls will lift the ship!

@Lonesharkx: Yea, but for a ship that big it would take a ton of ping pong balls...
Destronok promoted this comment

@JayhawkJake:
And a gigantic megaman crane is cheaper?
Normally, I'd go with the ping pong balls, but perhaps they happen to have the crane lying around and it created a good photo-op...
@JayhawkJake: I don't think there is a shortage of ping pong balls in Asia.

@Destronok: Or maybe you'd need the crane regardless.

Ping pong balls aren't going to make it fly.

@Destronok:
If I remember correctly, the largest shipyard in the world is in South Korea, and Hyundai, which runs it, has quite a few of these things 'just lying around' for other mega projects, yes.

[english.hhi.co.kr]
Edited by DoctorNine at 05/24/10 11:01 AM

It still looks like a photoshop. :D Needs a little bit of zooming out, to see the big picture.

Does that crane need footings in the ocean floor??

It looks like a toy. Amazing.

@Jonathan Parent: Nope it moves, looks like the one Samsung uses to build Supertankers

@Jonathan Parent: You just need the right counter weight.

@Jonathan Parent: No, they actually float, it's what they use to raise and lower oil platforms as well. Amazing engineering in them!

I guess this is what I get when I do not follow the news. How is it that they have not gone to war yet? Kudos to S. Korea's restraint in the matter.

This is a classic "Remember the Maine" from the Northwoods playbook. There'll be hundreds of $B to be made rebuilding the Koreas after the dust settles.
Image of Michai Michai 09:57 AM
No wonder S.Korea is pissed. It seems like such BS that N.Korea is literally free to pretty much whatever it wants. I think the ruling regime needs to be smacked off the map. Shit, they have brainwashed and starved their entire population for decades. I don't know about you guys but this would be a war I would support. The N.Korean people need to be freed.

@Michai: The dilemma is that a war will also hurt the North Korean people. It's hard to tell a mother of a starving kid that her child was killed during an air bombing for the greater good and future of the country. To her, that would sound exactly the same as the empty promises of the regime.
Michai promoted this comment

@Michai: I totally agree with you, but Obama won't be jumping at that opportunity any time soon. Most of the population had your opinion about the Iraq war and look what happened. Obama doesn't have the grapes to put his political career in jeopardy like that.
Michai promoted this comment

@Potentaint: Its important to note that Iraq paled in comparison in regards to the treatment of tens of millions starving people. Yes Saddam certainly killed people, and was obviously a sociopath. However, in respect to N.Korea, the ratio of population to abuse/psychological torture is sickening. The only reason we attacked Iraq instead of N.Korea was because of strategic location.

@Potentaint: Screw political careers. We're currently fighting two wars, and N Korea has a standing army of around 1 Million. This is a war no country is rushing to get into, and for good reason. It's not that we couldn't win, but it would be costly.

@Michai: The problem is that N.Korea has nukes. Pretty much limits the rest of the world because if we go after them, they'd just use them. Once you start using them, the rest of the world (who have nukes) joins in. With the exception of the US because our president signed some sort of executive order limiting our ability to deploy our nukes.

@Michai: Technically speaking, a new war wouldn't need to be declared. The Korean War never really ended, they've just been in a cease fire for almost sixty years. They just need to start fighting. This attack could be considered a violation of the cease fire agreement.

@Michai: You'd better be careful. If you keep talking like that, some people will start calling you a "war-hawk". I'm not saying I don't agree with you, but with today's political mindset, we should avoid any war at any price. You know, just bury your head in the sand and HOPE it goes away.

@Michai: A full-scale war with North Korea is a frightning prospect.

They already have one of the largest militaries on the planet; not to mention China's continued support.

P.S. - They both have nuclear weapons.

@Michai: I have one word for you, "Oil". Iraq has it, North Korea does not.

@Michai: There are several other issues to consider when contemplating attacking N. Korea.

1. They have nuclear weapons. Kim Jong Il is crazy enough to use them too. If he gets attacked, he may just decide to blow up S. Korea and Japan to spite the world.

2. China still supports N. Korea. If we were to begin a conflict with N. Korea, China may just jump in, and then we'd likely have world war 3. America would probably win against China, but it would cripple us.
MichelleTofi approved this comment

@Michai: You mean it *wasn't* because of WMDs, Al Qaeda connections and the threat to the US?
@Michai: While other peoples points are valid on this, the most important reason we won't attack N.Korea is because of their neighbor to the North, China. We could probably be out of Korea in 3-5 years, but we can't beat China, for a number of reasons. One being that they could turn the economy and the dollar to junk overnight, making it nigh impossible to get loans from any other countries to finance a war. Add in that they are a country of a billion people, Nukes, have standard if not superb military resources, and their cyberhacking will trump ours, we wouldn't win this war. That's why China always needs to be on board with sanctions brought on by the UN.

@Michai: Sadly, the level of injustices being committed is rarely the most influential point, or else many places would see intervention (Burma, for another example). North Korea has a nuclear bomb, even if its not the world's best, and more important, it has a standing army more than a million strong. It is not a matter of political will only--though most of that is negated by China's protection of N. Korea on the security council.
@Michai: No oil there so who cares....hmm maybe haliburton could start some shit over there.

@Michai: And its lack of nuclear weapons. WMD's are not all created equal.
@Michai: Let's also be aware that a war against North Korea would be a very costly one. The terrain north of the DMZ is rugged and mountainous, with countless chokepoints and little room for maneuver warfare (the kind the U.S. and its allies would like to fight). The North Koreans have had sixty years to fortify, pre-spot artillery and create deadly killzones that would cause unacceptable casualties for very little gain. They've buried most of their supplies in mountain tunnels and bunkers that are extremely difficult to get to.

In other words, going to war with them is not a very good idea if a clean, quick campaign is your goal. It would be a meat grinder and the public would not have any stomach for it.

@Michai: North Korea's military is over a million people and I doubt they would have any problems pressing the rest of the population into military service. Also, remember, that the population has had no contact with the outside world. They have been taught from birth that their leader is practically a god and is fighting the good fight against the evil west. The population would gladly die in service to their country. There is no military solution to N Korea. Patience and attempts at discussion is all that we can do.

@Michai: I agree with your sentiment, but I think you need to take a step back and examine your premise. At this point, I'm not sure the North Koreans want to be freed - I mean, sure, they probably would prefer not to live under a despotic government, but they are completely in the dark about their leaders and their position in the world. I wouldn't assume that they would great us as liberators.

Second, it's no small undertaking to go to war with North Korea. Their army may not be as advanced as that of the South Koreans or the United States, but by all accounts they do have 1.2 million troops. The South may be more advanced and have more troops, but I wouldn't think that there would be enough support for an invasion at this point, and even if there were it wouldn't be a cake walk.

Image of twilight-arc twilight-arc 11:06 AM
@chryse: Iraq goes to show us how long a "quick campaign" can be, and any "quick campaign" in N. Korea is going to be seriously long. Sometimes the only change can come from within, even if are talking decades.

The problem with ideological wars is that its hard to keep troop moral and really identify when the war has been won. Wars designed to win territory for keeps is much easier (relatively).

Vietnam helped save the Cambodians from the khmer rouge, but they were just perceived to be another invading force, even if they did help out.

@wætherman: To add to your comment, i think the lack of petrol in N.K. won't make it a likely target for freedom forces :o|

@Michai: Has nothing to do with the size of Obama's grapes. The country is simply too broke to help out (substantially) anywhere else. We've spent all our money on Iraq and the bailout (and continue to piss money away in Afghanistan). Oh well.
Edited by googligoo at 05/24/10 11:15 AM
i am constantly amazed at what man is able to do - the scale of that crane is beyond comprehension. and yet, there it is, raising a zillion ton half-battleship from the depths.
@adhir: It's an impressive lift but a 1,200 ton corvette is nowhere near the bulk of a 45,000 ton battleship.

@Turbineguy - now with reheat!!: i remain utterly amazed. 1200 tons = 2.4M lbs. they lifted it up. mad props to smart dudes and their physics.

Jeez, and I thought I was "Buoyant"...



nuff said.

My thoughts go out to those families who lost loved ones in this horrible incident.

Someone needs to push Kim Jong il down a flight of stairs.
Curves promoted this comment

@FriarNurgle: I think they already did and maybe thats part of the problem. (dain bramage)

@FriarNurgle: Just to be clear... I do not think anyone believes that this was an accident. It was an intentional act, by an insane dictator (read 5 year old) to see exactly what the world will let him get away with.


Your move, 이명박.
I didn't think AAA would travel that far out....would you believe the captain locked the keys in the ship too? What a jackass.

That's a "holy shit" crane. I've never seen a crane that big on a floating barge. Wow...

@FrankenPC: It's inflatable
This image is amazing but there's something I'm wondering...

How in the hell do you get chains that HUGE under a boat sitting on the ocean floor?! And don't say divers cause each of those links is the size of a diver.

@Travis Gohr: They would have to drag a runner line which would winch a cable which would winch that HUGE f'king chain. I imagine it's a long process.

@Travis Gohr: Soft sea bed, presumably.. dig out channels underneath.

@Travis Gohr: You start with smaller chains run by a diver or ROV Submersible, and then pull larger chains (sometimes with intermediate sizes), through.
@Travis Gohr: Might be a trade secret. *shrug*

Now you got me wondering. I have an old friend who's a diver and I've seen pics associated with him that had 4-inch chain links holding up rig legs or something. That's 4-inches in diameter - not long.

I'll have to look him up.

@Travis Gohr: Korean hulk

@Travis Gohr: They temporarily set aside their anger at Japan over atrocities from WWII just long enough to borrow Godzilla.

@Alfisted: DAMN YOU ALFISTED. DAMN YOU.
rumor has it... this is being moved to dubai to be a swinging pirate ship ride atop the world's tallest building.
Edited by obbie at 05/24/10 9:38 AM


...i would like to have seen Montana....
farcedude promoted this comment

@owen-magnetic: this made my day


This is a wikipedia image of another Pohang class corvette - now you can see it really is only half the boat being lifted in the first picture.
Edited by Dadjoe at 05/24/10 9:36 AM

@Dadjoe: the other half is in the second picture

What concerns me is that this has been barely reported in the news. All ways slightly unnerved when a tech blog has more in depth international news than the BBC
@bldwn: What are you talking about? The BBC had this as headline news a couple of days ago, when they confirmed that it was a N.K torpedo. There's also been considerable coverage of Hilary Clinton's trip to the NEA region.

Mind you, this is the BBC News in the UK... you get a different feed for BBC News America/BBC World Service.

@bldwn: The picture of the ship being lifted up is /old/. I've seen it on BBC and Yahoo many times before. Giz is really late with this.



I have a feeling the rest of the crane probably looks something along these lines:
Travis Gohr promoted this comment

@VViley: This looks like the power plant from the the background of every scene of the movie CONSPIRACY THEORY. Let's torture Mel Gibson again!!

@VViley: the science in this is crazy how something like this just doesn't sink is beyond me.
I guess Yoda was too busy to help pull this out of the water..
Michai promoted this comment

@chumleyex: Phfft! Not so - he just got offended when they said they'd 'try' to lift it out of the water.

@Unspellable: Always with you it can not be done /sigh

I'm wondering how all of this is going to affect my upcoming move to Korea.

@the real that guy dave: Just stay out of range of the North Korean artillery pieces and you'll be find. That means you can't be in Seoul.

@the real that guy dave: Probably not the best idea right now...

@tundraboy: I'll be 2 hours south of Seoul.

@Yerzriknot: My wife is a dentist in the Air Force, so it's not really my idea.

@Yerzriknot: a bad korea move..?

@the real that guy dave: At least you'll be on a base full of armed people if shit hits the fan.
Image of the real that guy dave the real that guy dave 09:48 AM
@Yerzriknot: Nope. I won't be living on base, but I'll be just fine if the shit hits the fan. Or I won't. One of those.

@the real that guy dave: I'm not going to lie, I wouldn't be too excited about moving to the Korean peninsula right now. There is definitely an ominous cloud hanging over that area. Good luck with whatever you choose, and make sure you keep us Gizmodians updated on a regular basis.
the real that guy dave promoted this comment
@Potentaint: Luckily, Korea has the full internets. I'm not too concerned about the situation there to be honest. I'm also a photographer, so if a war does break out, it will present a great opportunity for me personally.

The best we can all hope for is no war and a total failure of the North Korean government. I've actually wondered out loud about being Sam Adams for the North Korean people, but I'm not to keen on the whole dying thing.

@the real that guy dave: try the stir fried terrier, i hear it's good
the real that guy dave promoted this comment

@the real that guy dave: You should read "Nothing to Envy" by Barbara Demick (if you haven't yet). It's about defectors from North Korea, and their experiences both in North and South Korea.
As to the hope that the North Korean government is going to collapse, I'm not so sure about that - people have been saying that for the last 15 or so years, and it still hasn't happened.
Also, I've heard from my sister-in-law (who was an army korean linguist) that if North Korea were to invade, they'd make it about 10 miles across the border before they'd realize, holy shit, that everyone else in the world does live better than them.

@the real that guy dave: While I'm sure they would appreciate a brewer of that stature, I think they have more pressing issues dave.
the real that guy dave promoted this comment

@farcedude: That's my thought. They make our poor look like Donald Trump.

Image of the real that guy dave the real that guy dave 10:22 AM
@Frizzaldo...: Can't do it. I'll eat anything but dog.

@Yerzriknot: hell, just living amongst the South Korean public would be safe enough, after all the entire South Korean Male population attends compulsory Military service for 2 years and is effectively one large Militia.

Which is not unusual, when South Korea is still technically at War with the North.

@the real that guy dave: can I have yours then?

@the real that guy dave: You'll be fine, every man in South Korea has Military training and effective population size Militia. Well a 100 Mbit bandwidth consuming, digital-mobile-TV watching, Paperless transaction, Starcraft obsessed, Chilli-laced-food, Chobol-Gangster run, best-mind-fucking-horror-thriller film producing, female plastic surgery manic population.

So sleep safe!

:]
the real that guy dave promoted this comment

@Onizuka-GTO: My own personal safety is not a concern. I have, what I'll refer to here as, training. That's not the issue. I just hope they don't suspend visa approvals.

The bandwidth is going to be awesome though.

@the real that guy dave: Welcome to China! We eat everything except Dogs!

Promise*!

:]

*Except provenance situated near the Korean peninsula and Ethnic Hakka & Punti rural communities

The worst part is that the majority of those in the ship were military service personnel, remember that here in SK males must do two years in the Army whether you like it or not, these people did not lose their lives choosing to be soldiers.

Thats why this is so sad, its easy to rationalise a soldiers death, its a tragedy but an expected risk, students and kids just out of high school is a little different, especially when most of them are probably trapped inside of the sealed sleeping quarters of the pic your looking at.

All that aside, thats not even the biggest crane :S i'll try to scurry up a link.
the real that guy dave promoted this comment

@Aklost: I agree with you. Military conscription is just slavery.

@Aklost: There is a difference between those that find themselves in harm's way, and those that put themselves there. Still tragic either way.

@Aklost: While I think every man (or woman) should be more than willing to help their country out in any way they can, I don't believe in forced service. Think about it this way, in a war, do you want the guy with brass balls who signed up on his own free will, or the guy who got dragged away from his Nintendo to put his two years in. Exactly.

@Lizard_King: You're right. It's far more impressive when Soldiers put themselves in harms way so you don't have to be.
Lizard_King promoted this comment

@the real that guy dave: Whoa whoa WHOA! There's a difference between conscription and national service!

When your country is at risk every moment of your life i.e. Israel and South Korea, or when the country is small i.e. Singapore, national service is a perfectly logical course of action. I cannot speak for SK and Israel, but ask any Singaporean what they think of NS and many will say they're proud to have served.

If you want an example of real conscription, look at Africa or Burma instead.
the real that guy dave promoted this comment
Edited by Schizzy at 05/24/10 10:01 AM

@Schizzy: There is no difference. Nationalism and patriotism are all bullshit tools of old men who don't fight wars.

@angstman: More impressive, no. I don't agree with mandatory drafts for combat, and it is a nice luxury to live in a country that has a large enough volunteer military to not need a draft, and something that should not be forgotten by those who choose not to serve.

@the real that guy dave: When your country is still formally at war with your extremely heavily militarized batshiat crazy neighbors to the north I think I'd be a little more understanding of required military service. South Korea is hardly the first or only country to do this, and many countries still do it.

@Lite: an adventurer is me!: It doesn't make it right. Maybe it would be different if countries fought wars to win them, but they don't. Wars are financed by banks to control economies.

@the real that guy dave: uh North Korea invaded South@the real that guy dave: uh North Korea invaded South Korea. Not much bank involvement there. Same goes with Israel. They also require service in their military. It is convenient when your whole populace knows how to pick up a gun and defend their homes. Which is the basic premise of mandatory service. Korea. Not much bank involvement there. Same goes with Israel. They also require service in their military. It is convenient when your whole populace knows how to pick up a gun and defend their homes. Which is the basic premise of mandatory service.

It isn't some excuse it is merely the reality and practicality that some people are forced to live with. Up until after the Vietnam Police Action even the US had a draft system.
Edited by Lite: an adventurer is me! at 05/24/10 10:46 AM

@the real that guy dave: Kind of easy to say that 60 years out from the two biggest military conflicts in world history. Although your bank theory is novel. If there were ever another large conflict on that scale again, the draft would be an appropriate measure to institute. ( I prefer volunteer military FTR)
the real that guy dave promoted this comment

@Engineerman: You know, slavery was the best way to ensure profitability of a plantation.

@the real that guy dave: keep in mind that you are also looking at them as a westerner. Their culture may allow for a more communal society in which common defense is considered normal.
the real that guy dave promoted this comment

@chargernj: You're absolutely right about that. I'm also a big believer in the individual. I freely admit my bias, but I still believe slavery, no matter the explanation, is wrong.
Oh hey, I've seen that crane before. It's how Sally Struthers gets her pants on in the morning.

BTW, does the torpedo count as an act of war?
★☆★rasprenkle★☆★ promoted this comment

@Desu-San-Desu: it was an attack, it would count as an act of war.

@Desu-San-Desu: im pretty sure they've been at a defacto state of war since the Korean war in the 50-60's

@★☆★rasprenkle★☆★: Well I know that there was never an official peace treaty and that they're essentially in the middle of the longest cease-fire in history, but I'm wondering if this officially ends that cease-fire and could launch both countries into a full-on assault on each other.

@★☆★rasprenkle★☆★: NK and SK never left the state of war.

@Desu-San-Desu: The Koreas have had plenty of skirmishes in the last sixty years, and I don't think this counts as an unusually big act of aggression in this history. Something only breaks the cease-fire if someone decides that it has been broken, and there's no war South Korea's going to start that war again.

@Desu-San-Desu: Wikipedia the Lusitania for your answer. (Quick answer; it started WW1 [as far as the US is concerned])

@Desu-San-Desu:
does the torpedo count as an act of war?
To Sally Struthers?

@★☆★rasprenkle★☆★: Actually it's been a "de facto peace". "De facto" means "something that is, despite not being officially that way".

A "de facto" war would mean a war that wasn't officially declared, but actively pursued. In the case of Korea, however, it's still in an official state of war, but that war hasn't been fought for a long time.

Compare this to the "de facto independence" of Taiwan: Taiwan has not officially declared itself independent, however it operates pretty much like an independent nation. Thus, this is a "de facto independence" (i.e. one that's not officially declared).
@Desu-San-Desu: this happened a few months ago

@Santos L Halper: Yeah, I'm well aware of the Lusitania. But I'm just wondering why this wasn't approached with the same severe retaliation as the Lusitania was. Not that I'm wanting them to go to war or anything, I'm just intrigued by the nuances of the politics involved.

@Chip Skylark of Space: I blame the A.D.D...

@Frizzaldo...: A few months I was kinda sorta living in a homeless shelter, so I wasn't very aware of global events at the time. It's news to me.

@Desu-San-Desu: This is far from the first time that North Korea has done something like this. I believe that in at least one incident that US service personnel were killed as well. However, it is not in the best interest of the South to go into a full scale war with the North as it would devastate the economy and set the country back decades. Plus, don't underestimate the military power of the North. A large part of their economy is spent on the military, which coupled with an inefficient communist model for the rest of the economy, is why it's people have such a bad life.

@Desu-San-Desu: yes it does count as a act of war.. stay tuned for the Korean War part duex

@Desu-San-Desu: The reason is because we have an extreme lack of leadership in our higher government, and they are personally afraid to lead this nation to what must be done; which is war. They fear war themselves and subsequently this story is absolutely not to be touched by the main stream media. You can't find this anywhere on TV. The same way you cannot find the fact that the Gulf oil rig was not an accident but an attack by a (you guessed it) North Korean sub. Try finding that in the news. America is being prodded by her enemies and they are finding weakness everywhere which makes them salivate at the thought of what they can accomplish without having to worry about her response.

RAISE THE TITANIC!

Image of scrapplejoe scrapplejoe 09:23 AM
This is how you start world war 3.

@scrapplejoe: scrapplejoe = Nostrodamus

You could be right.

I would not want to be one of those little intertube boats zippin' around that thing while it's in the air...
Image of PaddyDugan PaddyDugan 09:22 AM
Now, if only they could use that crane to reach down and pull the "Beloved Leader" out of his palace. I'd love to see him suspended a few hundred feet above the ocean.

@PaddyDugan: I hear his son, loves hittin up the worlds Casinos..

@★☆★rasprenkle★☆★: Oh, I hope not! I like to think that is one family that isn't safe outside of their private little kingdom.

@PaddyDugan: What I hope for is that the son will see what the rest of the world is like, notice that it's a hell of alot better than his home country, not turn out as crazy as his old man, and seize power from his dad and embrace capitalism to end the sorry state of his country. The sins of the father are not necessarily the sins of the son, unless he's just as crazy as KJI.

I find it interesting that the numbering is in English and not Korean. Also - I hate to point this out Jesus but that's not the stern portion of the ship. That's the bow.
Edited by GizChick at 05/24/10 9:22 AM

@GizChick: "A few weeks later, on April 15, the South Korean Navy recovered the stern part"

The second photo is the stern

@GizChick: It's not English numbering. The numbering system that is most commonly used in the world (digits 0..9) is actually a Hindu-Arabic numbering system.
MichelleTofi approved this comment

@GizChick: The picture with the whole crane shows the stern section.
@GizChick: I've never heard of "English" numbers before... Numbers are fairly universal. Hence why math is considered a universal language.

'임시 공개 게시판' 카테고리의 다른 글

I`m not a doctor!  (0) 2010.05.25
Chrome Hearts x Cervélo  (0) 2010.05.25
E boardtracker Bike  (0) 2010.05.24
Concrete USB Memory  (0) 2010.05.24
Solid Gold iPad  (0) 2010.05.24